Is Mass Madness in the Rearview Mirror? - Fukushima Day Updated Edition
Reviewing Recent History and Lessons to be Learned
[Authors’ note:
Triple Meltdowns! Remarkably, just in time for Fukushima Day, March 11, 2023 - the 12-year anniversary of Japan’s horrific triple nuclear reactor meltdowns – two other meltdowns are happening!
The Silicon Valley Bank, 16th. largest in the U.S., melted down and collapsed, potentially triggering collapse of the whole house of bankrupt cards. PLUS the official Covid narrative is also in meltdown mode.
This week former Centers for Disease Control (CDC) head Dr. Robert Redfield, under oath, dropped his bunker buster Congressional testimony, and House lawmakers, both Democrats and Republicans, unanimously voted for declassification of Covid-related intelligence documents related to Covid origins.
And after an additional new bombshell report to the House’s Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, Republican Senators began to call for the prosecution of Dr. Tony Fauci for his gain-of-function lies and crimes against humanity.
In this Update we look at the Covid crisis. Our next Substack post will update the Fukushima and banking meltdowns.]
James Heddle, Mary Beth Brangan - EON
Covid Narrative Hesitancy – Cognitive Natural Immunity
After our over 40 year career of professionally questioning authority on nuclear and electromagnetic safety and election protection issues, in the early days of the Sars-2 panicdemic we were highly dubious of the official narrative being disseminated in what looked to us like a state-of-the-art, military grade information and psychological operation (psyop) involving the obvious stoking of excessive fear to secure unquestioning compliance.
We began collecting what soon became an archive of file boxes overflowing with information supporting our ‘official narrative’ hesitancy.
Our research was triggered by an interview with Dr. Francis Boyle, early in the crisis, in which he asserted that, in his informed view, the ‘novel’ Covid-19 pathogen had been engineered in a bio-weapons lab and released either by accident or intent.
Bioterrorism Buster
Boyle is a professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law, and a major authority on bioterrorism. He drafted the U.S. domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention, known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989. His draft legislation was approved unanimously by both Houses of the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President George H.W. Bush.
Being familiar with Boyle and his previous work, we took his views and links seriously.
Origin Stories
Today an on-line search will easily turn up articles - such as this one in the Intercept - reporting how a panicked e-mail exchange between U.S. and U.K. health officials led to the publication March 17, 2020 of an influential article in Nature Medicine titled “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2. The piece concluded, “our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated construct.” Its effect was to shut down any consideration of possible lab origin as ‘unscientific conspiracy theory,’ and provide a basis for destroying the credibility and careers of dissenting scientists.
But one of the article’s authors, evolutionary biologist Dr. Kristian Andersen had originally had a very different opinion. On January 31, 2020, at 10:32 p.m., Anderson had emailed Dr. Fauci with a warning:
[O]ne has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered . . . Eddie [Holmes], Bob [Garry], Mike [Ferguson] and myself all find the genome inconsistent with evolutionary theory.
Why did Dr. Andersen go from COVID-19 “looks…engineered” to “[It] is not a laboratory construct.” The fact that he was subsequently paid a $1.88M grant plus $16.5M in funding by Fauci may have had something to do with it, not to mention a pile-on by other influential actors, such as NIAID head Tony Fauci and Jeremy Farrar, then director of the U.K.’s Wellcome Trust and now tapped to be chief scientist at the World Health Organization.
Corruption and Collusion Proof
And that was just the tip if the iceberg of corruption and collusion surrounding the origin story imbroglio. Investigator Adam Andrzejewski has revealed the kickback network involved in his article Fauci’s Royalties And The $350 Million Royalty Payment Stream HIDDEN By NIH.
On March 5, 2023 the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Majority Staff wrote in a Memo to Subcommittee Members stating:
New evidence released by the Select Subcommittee today suggests that Dr. Fauci“ prompted” the drafting of a publication that would “disprove” the lab leak theory, the authors of this paper skewed available evidence to achieve that goal, and Dr. Jeremy Farrar went uncredited despite significant involvement. (Original italics.)
That was then; this is now, and the clots continue to thicken.
Counter-Spinning the Counter Spin – Seems All Lies are Fair in Information Warfare
The opening screen grab from the recent WSJ publication, Lab Leak Most Likely Origin of Covid-19 Pandemic, Energy Department Now Says, shows that the 2020 conclusion is now being challenged in official circles based on new, undisclosed ‘evidence’ from – of all places - the U.S. Department of Energy (DoE) and the FBI.
Now indications are that the lab origin story, once used as the basis of one psyop, is now being recycled into use for yet another mass psyop, this one with ominous partisan and geopolitical undertones involving Republican investigatory posturing, finger pointing and China demonization to prepare the public mind for yet another war.
Cutting through all that is a timely recent report from contrarian commentator Dr. David Martin. With his usual acerbic irreverence and wit, Martin unpacks three key reports that, taken together, he asserts, unequivocally reveal ‘the Smoking Clone.’
The first is the September 2019 publication The World At Risk, the first annual report on Global Preparedness for Health Emergencies by an entity calling itself the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board.
On the cover in September of 2019 is the picture of the ‘novel’ SARS-CoV-2virus that will – surprise, surprise - officially infect the world months later with the March 11, 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Inside is the warning:
“Countries, donors and multilateral institutions must be prepared for the worst. A rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen (whether naturally emergent or accidentally or deliberately released) poses additional preparedness requirements.” [Original italics]
Martin points out that the operative word is ‘release.’
“It's funny how the media continues to insist that there was either a leak or somehow a natural zoonotic transfer, but nobody is bothering to read the actual words written by the perpetrators themselves, which said ‘release.’ You know what that means, somebody with intent let it out. This is not a, oops, it got away. This is a word that they used and the word that they used was release of a respiratory pathogen.”
Martin’s second citation is a recent disclosure from Moderna a business report showing a royalty payment of $400 million to NIAID, clearly demonstrating their corrupt symbiotic relationship.
It turns out that if we look at precisely what Moderna said in its recently published report, it said the cost of sales was 1.9 billion or 39% of product sales for the fourth quarter of 2022, including third party royalties of 604 million of which 400 million related to a catch up payment to the National Institute of Allergy Infectious Disease for a new royalty bearing license agreement executed in December.
Martin’s third incriminating source is a September, 2019 publication presciently titled “SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence.”
Here are key disclosures from that September, 2019 document, the primary researcher and author of which was Dr. Ralph S. Baric of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill:
· He proudly described his gain-of-function research despite the fact that the publication of the article was during a declared moratorium on ‘gain-of-function’ research.
· Martin points out that “Biosafety and biosecurity reported studies were initiated after the University of North Carolina Institutional Biosafety Committee approved the experimental protocol project title generating infectious clones of bat SARS like COV, lab safety plan, et cetera, et cetera.
· These studies were initiated before the US government deliberative process research-funding pause on selected gain of function research involving influenza, MERS, and SARS. That, by the way, is the gain of function moratorium. … N I A I D read it, they reviewed it, they approved the publication of this and the protocol that was done.”
· The paper describes the process by which a manufactured clone of “bat CoV sequences and plasmid of WIV1-CoV spike protein,” supplied by Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology was inserted into an existing virus to increase its virulence and infectiousness.
Martin concludes,
“And we did it where? Not inside of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China. We did it at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill in violation of all of the statutes prohibiting the work on amplifying biologic agents for the purpose of weaponizing them against humanity. These are criminal admissions of violations of 18 US codes. And to date, not a single member of Congress, not a single attorney general, not a single prosecutor anywhere in this country, not a single governor – no one is willing to have the courage and or fortitude to actually look at the published admissions, published admissions that are right here on the page.”
Redfield’s Revenge
That situation began to change on March 8 with the sworn testimony of Dr. Robert R. Redfield, ex-director of the CDC, before the House Select Committee on the Coronavirus Crisis in which he directly accused Fauci and the US Government for murdering millions of people.
Dr. Redfield had been kept out of the loop by the group of perpetrators behind the cover-up. That probably was because, as he relates,
From the earliest days of the pandemic, my view was that both theories about the origin of COVID-19 needed to be aggressively and thoroughly examined. Based on my initial analysis of the data, I came to believe—and still believe today—that it indicates COVID-19 infections more likely were the result of an accidental lab leak than the result of a natural spillover event. This conclusion is based primarily on the biology of the virus itself, including its rapid high infectivity for human to human transmission which would then predict rapid evolution of new variants, as well as a number of other important factors to include the unusual actions in and around Wuhan in the fall of 2019, all of which I am happy to discuss today.
Back in 2020, when the response to the pandemic was being shaped, Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio), had asked Dr. Redfield in a hearing, “Has gain-of-function stopped the pandemic in your opinion?” Dr. Redfield replied, “No. On the contrary, I think it has caused the greatest pandemic the world has seen.”
At the current hearing, Rep. Brad Wenstrup, now chair of the subcommittee, had this to say:
“This is a national security issue. This is a national health issue. Discovering the origins is vital. It matters for the future of the world, and we aren’t finished. We’re just beginning. There will be more hearings and more inquiries and more documents discovered, and we will follow every lead.”
A subsequent development lent veracity to his words.
House Unanimously Passes Bill to Declassify COVID Origins Intel, Heads to Biden’s Desk
Recent History Must Not Be Memory Holed - Out of the Covid Closet
On the basis of our own subsequent research, we first started critiquing what we called the ‘attempted covid coup’ in our Substack blog - for example:
Capitalism’s Crisis and Covid Psychosis
Capitalism’s Crisis and Covid Psychosis - Part Two - Updated
WEF’s Global Infiltration Corps – Anatomy of an Attempted Transnational Coup D'état [Updated]
We also started sharing other reports to our growing private list. We evoked a swift barrage of negative responses from several directions.
We had anticipated repercussions, but we were mindful of Gurdjieff’s aphorism, “To know and not to act is not to know.” Our consciences wouldn’t let us stay silent, and not sharing what we knew was causing psychological depression and even physiological repercussions.
Family members pleaded that we ‘quit sending that crazy conspiracy theory stuff.’ Some activist friends were dismissive, even hostile and cut us off. Internet outlets on which we had formerly published stopped posting our stuff. Advisors told us we were being ‘irresponsible.’ One of our consultants reflexively resigned, but then reconsidered. Nevertheless, we persisted.
On the other hand, we gained a number of new friends whose crap-detector buzzers were also loudly going off. We shot and posted video reports of early regional resistance events.
The Town That Fought to Test Itself
Then came the testing. Our little coastal village had long been a notorious bastion of dissent and quirky diversity. Once, back in the ‘seventies, it had become famous from Orville Schell’s and Ilka Hartmann’s book ‘The Town That Fought to Save Itself’ in the face of an off-shore oil tanker spill and inappropriate, ecologically destructive development plans. Now, in an early instance of misguided misanthropic philanthropy, it became the site of one of the first mass PCR testing experiment. Its proud history of cantankerous contrariness was co-opted into slogan epitomizing uninformed consent and frightened compliance. It was now touted as ‘The Town That Fought to Test Itself.’
Entire Town Of Bolinas To Be Tested For Coronavirus
Two well-meaning young Silicon Valley millionaires teamed up with local medical people, a nearby university, and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative to fund a drive-through nasal swabbing fest at the local firehouse parking lot. The reigning meme was “You have to get tested not only for your own safety, but to protect your neighbors, the town’s front-line workers, (and grandma).
Never mind that the PCR test used around the world was shown to yield inaccurate results subject to manipulation by means changing the cycles of replication of viral fragments, just as warned about by its inventor Nobel Laureate Dr. Kary Mullis, who clearly stated it could not be a diagnostic test. He explained that any substance could be found in a sample if enough replication cycles were performed.
Covid as a Computer Virus
Back in 2020 German scientist Christian Drosten, head of the Charite Institute of Virology in Berlin, and a team of fellow scientists in Europe and Hong Kong, published an article in Eurosurveillance that recommended a PCR test that was
immediately accepted as the standard of testing internationally. The WHO began sending test kits to affected regions.
Later that year Celia Farber published an article titled Ten Fatal Errors: Scientists Attack Paper That Established Global PC Driven Lockdown reporting that Drosten et all “…tragically offered a testing method that would yield between 80 and 97 percent false positive results, due to a non existent gold standard which would be the virus itself.”
Farber reported that the Drosten paper had been “challenged by 22 international scientists who wrote a letter demanding the paper’s retraction, along with an extensive critique citing 10 errors in the paper it deemed ‘fatal.’”
The critique (no longer available) was titled “External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-Cov-2 Reveals 10 Major Flaws At The Molecular and Methodological Level: Consequences For False-Positive Results.” Farber reported,
I reached one of the authors, Dr. Kevin Corbett, at his home in London. He spoke simply and with controlled apoplexy. He confirmed and cast additional light on the shocking fact that the paper was written in the absence of a viral isolate, among many other problems.
“Every scientific rationale for the development of that test has been totally destroyed by this paper. It’s like Hiroshima/Nagasaki to the Covid test,” he said. “When Drosten developed the test, China hadn’t given them a viral isolate. They developed the test from a sequence in a gene bank. Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. They had a code, but no body for the code. No viral morphology.”
I asked him to define “viral morphology” for the layperson.
“In the fish market,” he said, “it’s like giving you a few bones and saying that’s your fish. It could be any fish. Not even a skeleton. Here’s a few fragments of bones. That’s your fish. Listen, the Corman/Drosten paper, there’s nothing from a patient in it. It’s all from gene banks. and the bits of the virus sequence that weren’t there they made up. They synthetically created them to fill in the blanks. That’s what genetics is; it’s a code. So its ABBBCCDDD and you’re missing some what you think is EEE so you put it in. It’s all synthetic. You just manufacture the bits that are missing. This is the end result of the geneticization of virology. This is basically a computer virus.”
Cloud of Suspicion
With the bogus testing event, a toxic cloud of mutual suspicion descended over our village, a microcosm of the malignant miasma then beginning to envelope the state, the nation and beyond.
Then the mass inoculation craze set in. Frightened local residents swarmed to get the ‘free’ jabs (which were actually subsidized by their own taxes in the form of generous subsidies to indemnified Big Pharma firms). One local woman even started keeping a list of the un-jabbed.
Lockdowns began destroying local business. Social distancing markers appeared on the floors of public places. ‘No Mask, No Service’ signs went up in local shops.
That was followed by the mass masking madness. People started dodging around each other in a demented dance of mutual fear and loathing. Neighbors shrank away and scolded us for being bare faced. A grocery market manager in a nearby town threatened to throw me out of his store for not pulling my mask up over my nose.
We saw joggers wearing masks while going up hill, and long-distance cyclists wearing masks while riding on country roads in the open air. School kids and even toddlers with masks on became a common sight.
Our research sources, including a number of peer-reviewed meta-studies, were suggesting that not only were masks not effective at preventing infection or transmission, they actually caused physiological harm by reducing oxygen intake and cognitive ability, and forcing the rebreathing of accumulated toxins. They also caused long-lasting psychological damage by limiting facial cues and conditioning wearers to mindless obedience. Children were traumatized.
According to a massive recent British meta-study by a team of 12 international researchers in the study published Jan. 30 in the peer-reviewed U.K. journal Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, “Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza/SARS‐CoV‐2 compared to not wearing masks.”
The abstract reports, “There were no clear differences between the use of medical/surgical masks compared with N95/P2 respirators in healthcare workers when used in routine care to reduce respiratory viral infection.”
Nanoplastics and other harmful pollutants were found in the disposable facemasks, which were also found by an MIT study to pose a transgenerational environmental pollution problem..
Mass Migration
The so-called ‘laptop class’ moved into the Zoomosphere. More and more social interactions from business meetings and education classes moved on-line.
Delusions Seem to be Dispelling
Now, though some compulsive maskers still abound in public spaces, the madness seems to be abating - at least until the next psyop-induced panicdemic, as predicted by that self-appointed authoritative virologist, Bill Gates. (The recent attempt to float Monkey Pox as the candidate flopped. Will it be Bird Flu next?)
Serious critical questioning of the coordinated official policies imposed by nations around the world is beginning to occur in a growing number of quarters.
Will the initiating and implementing perpetrators be identified and held to account?
Terms like ‘thrombocytopenia,’ ‘myocarditis,’ ‘anti-body driven enhancement,’ ‘vaccine imprinting,’ ‘excess mortality’ and ‘sudden adult death syndrome’ are becoming common in informed discourse.
Viral videos of fit, young athletes collapsing in mid-game are in wide circulation. Booster take-up rates are dropping. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) injury and mortality numbers are getting more attention, even though reportedly being under-reported by up to 41 percent.
More informative is the valuable citizen website RealNotRare.com allowing injection injured people to share their stories directly with other victims by symptoms, diagnosis, state, vaccine brand and other factors.
The Hidden Hands of BARDA, DARPA and the DoD
The ‘Warp Speed’ rollout of untested, toxic, experimental, genome-altering inoculations is now known to have been under contract with of the U.S. Department of Defense and its sub-agencies the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).
Clinical testing expert Sasha Latypova and legal expert Katherine Watt have come forward with incontrovertible documented evidence to identify the instigators behind the perpetrators of what they term ‘history’s greatest crime against humanity.’
An extraordinary charge demands proof, and Latypova and Watt deliver chapter and verse.
The startling new information they uncover began with the documents gleaned under discovery in a 2021 lawsuit filed by whistleblower Brook Jackson.
PFIZER’S MOTION TO DISMISS RELATOR’S AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT
These were contracts between the U.S. Dept. of Defense and Pfizer-BioNTech to produce the mRNA vaccines. These contracts were a special type of contract with the DoD called an Other Transaction Authority (OTA.) (Ironically, President Eisenhower created them along with DARPA in 1958. Yet by 1961 as he left office he warned of the danger of the 'military-industrial complex.’)
OTA's allow DoD contractors to produce products like, say, bio-weapons falsely termed 'vaccines,' without adequate testing, with no regulation, no Congressional oversight and with complete liability exemptions from prosecutions for the harms caused.
Watt also explains how the legal framework has been systematically altered to allow this crime against U.S. citizens and humanity to happen.
Legalizing Fraud
We’ve been told that the Emergency Authorization Act gave Pfizer immunity from any liability for harm for its vaccines, UNLESS THERE WAS PROVEABLE FRAUD.
Pfizer has already had to pay $2.3 billion in fines as part of a 2009 settlement under the False Claims Act. So now they’re trying to remove and weaken any remaining laws that could make their fraud and the resulting harms (adverse health effects and deaths) illegal.
Whistleblower Brook Jackson established that there was loads of fraud in Pfizer’s clinical trials and sued to prove it under the False Claims Act. The documents she provided had 400 pages of evidence of falsified data, blind trial failures and more. However, Pfizer now actually alleges that because the U.S. government knew about their wrongdoings but continued to do business with the vaccine maker, that made it ok!
Karen Kingston emphatically argues “You can not contract to commit a crime!” And Pfizer’s contract repeatedly states that the contract with the DoD was to develop a vaccine that effectively prevented SARS-CoV-2 infection and that met the safety and efficacy regulatory standards of an FDA-EUA authorized or FDA-approved vaccine.
Brook Jackson’s lawyer states “This case will determine if Big Pharma can rip off the American people using a dangerous drug that harms millions without any legal remedy because they claim the government was in on the scam.”
So now, there is a certain mind-twisting irony in the WSJ citing the Department of Energy (DoE) and the F.B.I. as the new authorities on the bio-weapons lab leak in the emerging Blame China propaganda distraction campaign.
A Narrative Unravels
The glaring failure and collusive censorship of the legacy mass commercial media and corporate social media platforms has triggered an efflorescence of a new, world-wide ecology of media start-ups, bedroom podcasters and alternative dissenting media and information sources, some of which we have been sharing with friends and colleagues over the last months.
In a category by itself is the The Highwire, a viewer-supported weekly broadcast with millions of viewers worldwide.
Episode 309 of the HighWire opens with a rundown of the shifts in reporting that are occurring, and takes a well-deserved victory lap for the role the program has played in that spreading change in collective situational awareness.
Even some official bodies have begun a cautious process of evaluating the recent ‘pandemic response.’ At a Feb. 28, 2023 hearing of the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Martin Kulldorff, Ph.D described the government’s response as the “worst public health mistake in history.
The Lion of Truth is on the Loose
As this updated version goes to post, there is a wide range of articles from around the world that continues to challenge the on-going narrative and suggest that Augustine’s Lion of Truth is indeed abroad in the land.
Here are a few concluding revelatory highlights:
Naomi Wolf & Igor Chudov: Alarming Drop In Birthrates & Fertility Among mRNA Vaccinated Women. Statistical analyst Igor Chudov shares his findings on the relation of Covid inoculations to human reproductive capacity in both females and males. Birthrates drop as inoculation rates rise. Moderna’s dose is 3x higher than Pfizer’s. CDC data show Moderna causes 42% more miscarriages compared to Pfizer. Lipid nano particles (LPDs) in the shots migrate to and concentrate in the female ova and male gonads reducing fertility and sperm count. The effect is likely to be permanent because LPDs from an inoculated pregnant mother will also concentrate in the overies of the daughter fetus and thus be passed on to grand children.
Ed Dowd’s book “Cause Unknown” – The Epidemic of sudden Deaths in 2021 and 2022 is selling well. From a review:
What is killing healthy young Americans?
2020 saw a spike in deaths in America, smaller than you might imagine during a pandemic, some of which could be attributed to COVID and to initial treatment strategies that were not effective. But then, in 2021, the stats people expected went off the rails. The CEO of the OneAmerica insurance company publicly disclosed that during the third and fourth quarters of 2021, death in people of working age (18–64) was 40 percent higher than it was before the pandemic. Significantly, the majority of the deaths were not attributed to COVID.
A 40 percent increase in deaths is literally earth-shaking. Even a 10 percent increase in excess deaths would have been a 1-in-200-year event. But this was 40 percent.
And therein lies a story—a story that starts with obvious questions:
What has caused this historic spike in deaths among younger people?
What has caused the shift from old people, who are expected to die, to younger people, who are expected to keep living?
It isn’t COVID, of course, because we know that COVID is not a significant cause of death in young people. Various stakeholders opine about what could be causing this epidemic of unexpected sudden deaths, but “CAUSE UNKNOWN” doesn’t opine or speculate. The facts just are, and the math just is.
The Expose’ reports, Secret CDC Reports confirm 535k American Children & Young Adults have died since the FDA approved the COVID-19 Vaccine, resulting in a shocking 50% increase in Excess Deaths
Bill bailed just in time – in January the Defender reported, Bill Gates — After Reaping Huge Profits Selling BioNTech Shares — Trashes Effectiveness of COVID Vaccines
Global Death Tolls Mount
Holistic Health On-Line reports:
Exhaustive peer-reviewed study says MILLIONS worldwide now suffer from serious health problems caused by covid “vaccines” “The most likely “side effect” of covid jabs seems to be myocarditis (and other heart problems).”
Texas Lindsay reports that in the Philippines, excess mortality has hit 123%.
Steve Kirsch cites a 2022 Australian article showing “The mRNA vaccines are neither safe nor effective, but outright harmful.”
Graphene Schemes
Perhaps the most under-reported and taboo topic in the whole Covid Crisis discussion is the reported discovery - in multiple inoculation batches by multiple research teams around the world - of graphene and other nano-metal particles encased lipid hydrogel that are said to self-assemble inside the human body in response to external electromagnetic frequency signals.
Many journalists and scientists have been pilloried for speaking out on the issue. One of them is the irrepressible Karen Kingston whose work is cited above. In a recent post she reports, The patents for the COVID-19 mRNA lipid nanoparticles found on Moderna’s website state that the ‘vaccines’ contain fully-programmable, self-assembling, nanoparticles comprised of RNA and graphene oxide based molecules such as hydrogel.
Kingston shows that, “Pfizer and Moderna openly promote that the ‘vaccines’ contain mRNA nanoparticle technologies that host electronic fields with the cationic ‘lipids’ on their websites - “Without these lipid nanoparticles (cationic nanoparticle technology) there could be no Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine.” - PFIZER
In a recent podcast, she summarizes the evidence she has uncovered showing that:
The pegylated lipid nanoparticle can interact with electromagnetic devices.
Graphene oxide has now been confirmed to exist in the bioweapon which is manufactured in China.
The mRNA shots contain nanotechnology, create non-human structures inside the human body, and attack the central nervous system by crossing the blood-brain barrier.
Imperative to See the Delusions
The list of revelations grows each day, showing that it’s imperative for us all to wake up to the delusional narrative that is continuing to be disseminated, despite increasing emergent evidence of what’s truly being done to us under the guise of ‘protecting public health and the environment’ because now the next steps to controlling all aspects of our lives are being implemented under the guise of ‘sustainability’ and ‘saving the planet from Co2.’
See our previous post, Anthropogenic Climate Change and Geoengineering:Who's Doing What, and With Which, and to Whom...and Why?
Reject Digital Enslavement
Watch out for the central bank digital currency (CBDC) scheme and the UN ‘Sustainability Goals’ that aim to financialize nature and all natural processes.
Keep your eyes on the cascade of falling dominos sure to follow the collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and the subsequent moves of the bank bandit cartel. Their moves will usher in their dystopian central bank digital currency that will ensure enslavement.
Oppose the WHO being set up to supersede all governments’ constitutions globally in a planet wide medical martial law/save the planet tyranny. James Roguski’s site explains and has actions to take. https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/reject-digital-enslavement
Please subscribe for more on these issues.
Cognitively forewarned is cognitively forearmed. Informed dissent furthers.
We hope St. Augustine was correct in his famous assertion that:
"The truth is like a lion; you don't have to defend it. Let it loose; it will defend itself."
Mary Beth Brangan and James Heddle Co-Direct EON, the Ecological Options Network.. The EON feature documentary S.O.S. - The San Onofre Syndrome - Nuclear Power’s Legacy, will be released this year.
Well done!