Rumors of WW3
Discover more from Planetarian Perspectives from EON3
Rumors of WW3
Geocidal Brinksmanship on Prozac?
Hi All,
Tired of Zombie Nukes, Climate Chaos and Vax Injury stories? Here's a distraction.
Putin, NATO - Who's provoking whom?
At this point, does it really matter?
How about let's all blink and back away from the abyss?
Maybe geocide is not such a great business plan - even for arms dealers.
Peace on all their houses.
Mary Beth Brangan & James Heddle
The Pentagon’s Strategy for World Domination: Full Spectrum Dominance, from Asia to Africa
By Bruce Gagnon - Coordinator of the Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space - 2014
The Obama administration is currently deploying “missile defense” (MD) systems in Turkey, Romania, Poland and on Navy destroyers entering the Black Sea. The NATO military noose is tightening around Russia..
Russia has the world’s largest deposits of natural gas and significant supplies of oil. The US has recently built military bases in Romania and Bulgaria and will soon be adding more in Albania. NATO has expanded eastward into Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, right on Russia’s border. Georgia, Ukraine, Sweden and Finland are also on the list to become members of the cancerous NATO.
An Indian journalist observes,
“The arc of encirclement of Russia gets strengthened. NATO ties facilitate the [eventual] deployment of the US missile defense system in Georgia. The US aims to have a chain of countries tied to ‘partnerships’ with NATO brought into its missile defense system – stretching from its allies in the Baltic to those in Central Europe. The ultimate objective of this is to neutralize the strategic capability of Russia and China and to establish its nuclear superiority. The National Defense Strategy document, issued by the Pentagon on July 31, 2008, portrays Washington’s perception of a resurgent Russia and a rising China as potential adversaries.”
Overextending and Unbalancing Russia
Assessing the Impact of Cost-Imposing Options - A RAND Research Report from 2019
https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3063.html
This report examines a range of possible means to extend [as in provoke] Russia. As the 2018 National Defense Strategy recognized, the United States is currently locked in a great-power competition with Russia. This report seeks to define areas where the United States can compete to its own advantage. Drawing on quantitative and qualitative data from Western and Russian sources, this report examines Russia's economic, political, and military vulnerabilities and anxieties. It then analyzes potential policy options to exploit them — ideologically, economically, geopolitically, and militarily (including air and space, maritime, land, and multidomain options). After describing each measure, this report assesses the associated benefits, costs, and risks, as well as the likelihood that measure could be successfully implemented and actually extend Russia. Most of the steps covered in this report are in some sense escalatory, and most would likely prompt some Russian counter-escalation. Some of these policies, however, also might prompt adverse reactions from other U.S. adversaries — most notably, China — that could, in turn, stress the United States. Ultimately, this report concludes that the most attractive U.S. policy options to extend Russia — with the greatest benefits, highest likelihood of success, and least risk — are in the economic domain, featuring a combination of boosting U.S. energy production and sanctions, providing the latter are multilateral. In contrast, geopolitical measures to bait Russia into overextending itself and ideological measures to undermine the regime's stability carry significant risks. Finally, many military options — including force posture changes and development of new capabilities — could enhance U.S. deterrence and reassure U.S. allies, but only a few are likely to extend Russia, as Moscow is not seeking parity with the United States in most domains.
This Would Be A Wise Stopping Point For This War: Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix
Caitlin Johnstone
At the risk of upsetting the entire internet, the annexation of those four Ukrainian territories seems like a great time to end this war to me. Does anyone honestly believe a significant percentage of the people who live there want a massive counteroffensive on their doorstep? I don’t.
The west knowingly provoked this war, the thing experts warned for years would happen did happen, and now Ukraine lost some territory. Rather than risking millions or billions of lives escalating this conflict, it seems sensible to draw a line under it. You can yell “Putin bad!” and “International law!” all you want, but it’s just a cold hard fact that after the annexation the US/NATO/Ukraine tandem is going to be presented with the choice of either ending the bloodshed or massively, massively escalating it. Pretty easy choice, in my opinion.
EMERGENCY! This is heading for ALL OUT WAR
Redacted with Clayton Morris
Moments ago, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed and delivered the NATO application. Moments earlier Russian President Vladimir Putin officially annexed the four regions of the Donbass. This is heading for WW3.
DPR Civilians On Why They Wanted A Referendum To Join Russia
Eva K Bartlett 43.9K subscribers My overview of the DPR referendum to join Russia. It's mainly the people themselves talking, over the course of 5 days, including door-to-door voting (no, not at gunpoint) and voting in voting stations on the 5th day. Western commentators would do well to listen to them (but we know they won't). Summary: -they waited 8 years for this -they are tired of being bombed by Ukraine, they want peace & feel joining Russia will bring this -they were not intimidated or forced to vote, many (like Syrians) faced potential shelling in order to do so, many volunteered in order to ensure the referendum went ahead -they've long since given up caring what western commentators & "news" say about them (the same who whitewashed Ukraine's 8+ years of war crimes against the civilians of the Donbass).
DIANA JOHNSTONE: Omerta in the Gangster War
The sabotage of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline has virtually announced that the war in Ukraine can only intensify with no end in sight.
September 28, 2022
https://consortiumnews.com/2022/09/28/diana-johnstone-omerta-in-the-gangster-war/
U.S. Act of War against the European Union: Did President Biden Order the Terror Attack against Nord Stream?
In a televised news February 7, 2022 interview the President of the United States acknowledged that the United States would act against Nord Stream if required. This statement was made 3 weeks prior to the Russian invasion:
President Joe Biden: “If Russia invades that means tanks and troops crossing the border of Ukraine again, then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2.”
Reporter: “But how will you exactly do that, since the project is in Germany’s control?”
Biden:“We will, I promise you, we will be able to do that.” (emphasis added)
“Sabotage is the most likely cause of leaks in two Baltic Sea gas pipelines between Russia and Europe, European leaders have said, after seismologists reported explosions around the Nord Stream pipelines.”
According to European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen “the leaks” into the Baltic sea were due to “sabotage”: