Posted by James Heddle - EON
Who’s in Charge Here?
Certainly not the ‘Commander-in-Chief’, whether he’s a doddering old pedophile in terminal decline, or a narcissistic comb-overed con man and convicted felon.
And, certainly not ‘We The People’, the psyoped and indoctrinated masses.
Thus, the obvious and legitimate question arises, “Who’s really calling the shots – both kinetic and pharmaceutical. Who’s really running these dis-United States?
Chief Suspects
A) A global minority ruling class with Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum (WEF) its most familiar public face?
(B) A Zionist network of lobbyists, Israeli intelligence agents and investment bankers, the public faces of which are AIPAC, ADL and the Mossad. Plus Israeli military and intelligence contractors like Elbit Systems and Magal Security Systems.
(C) Bernays’ ‘invisible government? As in, “The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government, which is the true ruling power of our country.” - Edward Bernays, the father of public relations
(D) A transnational banking and finance elite epitomized by Blackrock and Vanguard.
(E) An international alliance of IT, military, intelligence, and security agencies.
(F) A Big Pharma, billionaire philanthropist cartel with Bill Gates as its poster-child and the World Health Organization (WHO) as its spear tip, handmaiden and enforcer.
(G) A globalist network of secret societies of blood-drinking, baby-eating, Lucifer-worshiping Satanists dedicated to total world control.
(H) An alien race secretly hiding inside the hollow earth.
(I) Agents of competing extra-terrestrial, galactic civilizations.
(J) Maybe some or all of the above.
But Occam's razor of ‘simplest explanation is most likely true’ would favor Suspect A, an oligarch elete.
Technocracy, G3P and The Rise of Global Public-Private Partnerships
A growing number of analysts converge on this view, including: Iain Davis, David Hughes, Emanuel Pastreich, Murray Rothbard, and Robert Malone.
Emanuel Pastreich, writing on Global Research, calls it, “the unlimited class warfare of the billionaires against all of humanity.”
Iain Davis wasl perhaps the first to publish an in-depth analysis of a new form of governance in his What Is the Global Public-Private Partnership?, or G3P, in 2021. I highly recommend reading it in full. He explained it this way.
“The Global Public-Private Partnership (G3P) is a worldwide network of stakeholder capitalists and their partners. This collective of stakeholders (the capitalists and their partners) comprises global corporations (including central banks), philanthropic foundations (multi-billionaire philanthropists), policy think tanks, governments (and their agencies), non-governmental organisations, selected academic and scientific institutions, global charities, labour unions and other chosen ‘thought leaders.’
“The G3P controls global finance and the world’s economy. It sets world, national and local policy (via global governance) and then promotes those policies using the mainstream media (MSM) corporations, which are also “partners” within the G3P.
Often those policies are devised by the think tanks before being adopted by governments, which are also G3P partners. Government is the process of transforming G3P global governance into hard policy, legislation and law.”
Davis goes on to warn of the G3P aspirational agenda according to which,
“The G3P will oversee everything. That includes every government, all business, our so-called communities (where we live) and each of us individually. Human beings are not the priority…. Centralised control of the entire planet—all its resources and everyone who lives on it—is the core ethos of the G3P….
“The G3P will determine the future state of global relations, the direction of national economies, the priorities of societies, the nature of business models and the management of a global commons. There is no opportunity for any of us to participate in either their project or the subsequent formation of policy….”
David Hughes, in his book, “Covid-19,”PsychologicalOperations,and the War for Technocracy develops the analysis further,
“An undeclared global class war was initiated in 2020, whose aim is the controlled demolition of liberal democracy and the institution of global technocracy—a novel, biodigital form of totalitarianism that threatens to lead to the irreversible enslavement of humanity. World War III looks nothing like its two predecessors and is waged by the transnational deep state against populations using the novel methods of Omniwar, i.e. war waged in every domain, but clandestinely, so that the public does not recognise it as such. The opening campaign of World War III involved the largest psychological warfare operation in history, which I call the “‘Covid-19’ operation.” This was intended to demoralise, disorientate, and debilitate the public, thus weakening its resistance to the intended transition to technocracy. Historically, psychological warfare has served as the prelude to physical war, raising the alarm concerning what is to come.”
Robert Malone summarizes the picture like this in a recent article,
“Since WW II and accelerating during the latter decades of the 20th century, a trend toward the emergence of financially powerful transnational organizations that are functionally independent of nation-states developed. Examples include quasi-governmental global organizations such as the United Nations (UN), World Health Organization (WHO), International Monetary Foundation (IMF), Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and World Trade Organization (WTO); non-governmental “philanthropic” organizations such as the Gates Foundation and Wellcome Trust; “national” banks tied together into a functional cooperative by the Bank of International Settlements; massive global “investment funds” which dwarf the financial resources of most nation-states including Blackrock, State Street, Vanguard, Bank of America and their kin; and a variety of globalist-oriented cabals and corporatist trade organizations such as the Club of Rome, the Atlantic Council, the Bilderberg Meeting group, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies and of course the World Economic Forum.
“Fueled by a variety of global 21st-century financial, political, geophysical, and medical “crises,” these transnational think tanks and organizations, together with a handful of major globalized corporations that sponsor much of their activities, have formed alliances that exceed the power, influence and financial resources of most if not all nation-states.… We argue that the wide range of current efforts to advance and structure global governance organizations is the logical consequence of these imbalances. Since the most economically dominant of these various transnational entities are intrinsically corporatist, it is self-evident that the emerging global governance organizations are corporatist. “
As I wrote in a previous piece,
“The picture that emerges is of a transnational pyramid of predatory power in which each layer consists of contending ‘public-private partnerships’ whose members prey on the layers below, and the small minority in the top tier preys on all those below through their interlocking and symbiotic organizations and un-elected meta-national agencies and commissions.
“Their existential problem and greatest fear is a potentially informed and vigilant global majority – there are more of us than there are of them.”
This perspective casts the coming U.S. election in a wider circle of light.
James Heddle co-directs EON, the Ecological Options Network with Mary Beth Brangan, who contributed to this post. The EON feature film documentary SOS – The San Onofre Syndrome: Nuclear Power’s Legacy, by filmmakers Brangan, Morgan Peterson and Heddle, was awarded the Grand Jury Award for Feature Documentary at last October’s Hollywood Awareness Film Festival. SOS has also garnered the International Uranium Film Festival’s award for Best Educational Documentary as well as two Outstanding Excellence awards. SOS is now available for on-line streaming on many platforms, including Amazon Prime. For links to view and more information about the issue, please visit the SOS Website.
The rise of technological domination has enabled a minority to manipulate information and resources on a larger scale, exacerbating social inequality. At this point, the public needs to pay more attention to these dynamics, promote transparency and accountability, to ensure that the use of technology and resources can truly serve the interests of all humanity, rather than the self-interest of a few individuals. https://eggy-car.vip/